Category: Organisational

Office Interior Inspiration March 2018

I have to admit, I love modern office interiors. While realising that a lot of thought has gone into the business drivers and practicalities of each spatial design, it is also great to see arrangements that speak to our inner child. Bright colours and wonderfully fresh (and sometimes strange) layouts can have a huge effect on our enjoyment of work. We can, at times, spend more time in the office than in our own homes, so this is a great trend to see.

Here are some of my favourites spotted on Instagram over the last few months.

Derived from the concept of playground where an atmosphere of fun, enjoyment, getting together and comfort seating in the air, this sectional seating systems accommodate your space in numerous, creative ways. BRACCA offers flexibility, possibility and options where users can create their combination with its extreme versatility. It is space saving and ideal for any meetings, be it small or large. Designer: Sujaklosophy #modularfurniture #modularsofa #creativeoffice #funoffice #officedesign #officeinspiration #officesofa #officefurniture #whiteboard #collaboration #team #officespace #workspace #project #projectfurniture #furnituremanufacturer #agileworkspace #activitybasedworking #wellbeing #employeewellness #newoffice

A post shared by Oasis Furniture (@oasis.furniture) on

The Ultimate Guide for preparing Homes and Buildings for Video

When discussing technology designs for homes and workplaces, I commonly get asked about the need for network cabling, especially where video streaming is concerned. Questions can vary from “Why do we even need cable when there’s Wi-Fi?”  to “Is Category 6 data cable enough when Category 8 cable is coming out?”  There are many myths to dispel around this, and this article will clear this up and make recommendations for your network environment.

“Why do we even need to run data cable when there’s Wi-Fi?”

The use of streaming video is rapidly increasing. Since it requires a guaranteed data transmission speed, and consumes the most network bandwidth, we’ll look at

  • the various video sizes
  • how fast data needs to transmit for video streams of these sizes
  • the speed capabilities of data cable and Wi-Fi networks.

Video sizes

Standard video sizes are shown in pixels and aspect ratios. (Click on the image for original size).

synergy environments screen sizes

As televisions and displays continue to grow in size there will be far greater demand to ensure correct network infrastructures are in place to guarantee data speeds.

Video speeds

The speed of data in networks is measured in Mbps (megabits per second). For some of the video sizes shown above, required data speeds need to be as follows:

synergy environments data speeds for video

Note that video streaming is always a variable experience as it’s dependent upon the codec used. Also, the amount of data being sent will vary from frame to frame, depending on the complexity of the image and the number of changes between frames at the time.

Data cable and Wi-Fi speeds

Compare the required data speeds above, to the actual or typical data speeds of various data cables and Wi-Fi standards below. This is an easy indicator for the minimum data and Wi-Fi networks required for your video application. (Click on the image for original size):

cable&wifi

Note: All category cable types use Twisted Pairs of copper wires hence all cables types end with TP. The first letters are used to describe the type of screen around them. U = Unshielded, S = braid screen or Shielded, F = Foil Shield.

“Is Category 6 cable enough when Category 8 cable is coming out?”

Category 7 and 8 Cable

Thicker cables (Cat 7 and above) with better shielding are ideal for industrial situations. They are more suited to data centres, than residential applications since they lack flexibility.

Category 7 is a shielded cable solution normally installed with non-traditional connectors that are not backward-compatible with category 3 through 6A. It is usually terminated with 8P8C compatible G45 connectors, or with TERA connectors. Fortunately shielded RJ45 connectors compatible with CAT6, CAT6A and CAT7 Solid and Stranded Cables have become available. Category 8 is the next UTP cabling offering to be fully backward compatible.

Category 8 is designed only for data centres where distances between switches and servers is short. It is not intended for general office cabling.

Wi-Fi

As you can see in the chart above, the theoretical speeds of wireless networks differ greatly from the actual or typical results found in real world environments. This often causes confusion for buyers who believe that their 802.11ac wireless router is going to effortlessly allow multiple streams of 4K/UHD video throughout their home.

The 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard is often referred to as Gigabit Wi-Fi as it theoretically exceeds 1 Gbps. It’s actual speed maxes out at 200 Mbps though. Many users typically experience 70 – 100 Mbps.

The Wi-Fi Alliance is looking at 802.11ac’s successor, 802.11ax. 802.11ax should deliver real-world speeds above 2Gbps. In a lab-based trial of technology similar to 802.11ax, Huawei hit a max speed of 10.53Gbps, or around 1.4 gigabytes of data transfer per second. Clearly, 802.11ax is going to be fast. It is unknown though when this standard will become readily available.

Network Equipment

All consumer grade (and most commercial grade) network equipment, such as routers, motherboards and Ethernet cards currently max out at 1000 megabits or 1 Gbps. For the time being, and likely years to come, users will not be able to take advantage of the 10 Gbps and faster speeds that Cat6a and higher cables are specified for.

Most home users use the Wi-Fi router supplied via their ISP, which by default is not a highly specified device. As an example, my home router is specified as 802.11b, 802.11g and 802.11n (2.4 GHz only). While the data transmission rates for these Wi-Fi standards are officially stated as 11 Mbps (802.11b), 54 Mbps (802.11g) and 300 Mbps (802.11n with an external antenna), those data speeds are actually around 5.5 Mbps, 20 Mbps and 35 Mbps respectively.

A single 4K video stream, requiring 15-20 Mbps, will either kill your Wi-Fi or at best consume most of the capacity of a commonly supplied Wi-Fi router, allowing very little, to no room, for anything else.

It’s for this reason alone that companies who manufacture 4K capable entertainment devices, like the Apple TV 4K and Google Chromecast Ultra, require a data cable to their Ethernet ports. This is the only way to ensure the quality of a 4K video stream.

Recommendations

If you want guaranteed 4K video for your new 4K or UHD television, make sure you have data cable run to it’s location – your current Wi-Fi network will NOT be sufficient.

Cat 6 cable is still the industry standard for homes and offices and is likely to be for quite a while. With its capacity for 1 Gbps up to 100 meters and 10 Gbps up to 37 meters, it will definitely ‘”future-proof” your environment for a very good number of years to come. If you want guaranteed peace of mind then spend a little extra for category 6a.

Once 802.11ax Wi-Fi becomes available it will easily handle streaming 4K video (15-20Mbps) within its +2Gbps capacity. Even if Netflix begins streaming 8K in the next few years 802.11ax has more than enough bandwidth. This will definitely resolve the bandwidth issues for the majority of older homes that do not have a home network cabling infrastructure.

Until 802.11ax becomes available, upgrading your Wi-Fi router to 802.11ac is the next best recommendation.

Last, but not least, choose a home automation designer or workplace technology consultant to design a complete data cabling strategy. You will save yourself regret sometime in the future.

——-

Synergy Environments is the blog of Dean Murrell. He is a Christchurch, NZ based designer of audio visual and automated technology for organisational workspaces and residential homes. Feel free to contact him via the contacts page should you need further help and advice.

The Way We Get Power Is About to Change Forever

I have the privilege of working in a building that is powered by the sun. Our company now generates it’s own power.

I love that fact.

Not just from the perspective of conservation (I live in NZ – hydro-electric power has provided more than half of the country’s electricity needs for the last 100 years), but the fact that we, and other adopters of solar power, are on the path towards self-sufficiency.

I also love the fact that our company is a provider of photovoltaic panels and therefore installed it’s own solar system. We practice what we preach. Most days we generate more power than we use and put power back into the grid. The money we make from our daytime generated power, means that our night time power usage only costs us 2/3’s of the standard cost.

Having our night time power costs reduced by 33% is great. Having our daytime power costs reduced by 100% is amazing! But it’s not yet as efficient as we need it to be.

We need to be 100% self sufficient, 24 hours a day. We all need to stop using fossil fuel.

The age of batteries is just getting started. In the latest episode of their animated series, “Sooner Than You Think”, Bloomberg’s Tom Randall does the math on when solar plus batteries might start wiping fossil fuels off the grid.

——-

Synergy Environments is the blog of Dean Murrell. He is a Christchurch, NZ based designer of audio visual and automated technology for organisational workspaces and residential homes. Feel free to contact him via the contacts page should you need further help and advice.

Why Our Spend on Employee Engagement Buys Us So Little

Source by Jacob Morgan

employee-engagement-software

Organizations are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on employee engagement programs, yet their scores on engagement surveys remain abysmally low. How is that possible? Because most initiatives amount to an adrenaline shot. A perk is introduced to boost scores, but over time the effect wears off and scores go back down.

When organizations make real gains, it’s because they’re thinking longer-term. They’re going beyond what engagement scores are telling them to do in the moment and redesigning employee experience, creating a place where people want, not just need, to work each day. But what does that mean, and what does it look like?

To understand this, I interviewed 150 psychologists, economists, and business leaders around the world. The executives included heads of HR, innovation, IT, and diversity, and they represented a range of industries and sectors (tech, manufacturing, retail, professional services, education, start-ups, and others). Based on those conversations, I identified three environments that matter most to employees: cultural, technological, physical.

After analysing more than 250 diverse organizations, drawing on the Fortune 100 and various “best workplaces” lists, I found that over half the companies were rated poorly by their employees in at least one of the three areas, and 20% got very low scores across the board. Although 23% were making strides in all three areas, just 6% were investing heavily in all three — and those “experiential organizations” (Adobe, Accenture, Facebook, Microsoft, and others) saw performance gains.

When I interviewed business leaders at the top-scoring organizations, they told me their investments in the three employee experience environments had led not only to happier employees but also to larger talent pipelines and greater profitability and productivity.

Those that invested most heavily in employee experience were included 28 times as often among Fast Company’s Most Innovative Companies, 11.5 times as often in Glassdoor’s Best Places to Work, 2.1 times as often in Forbes’s list of the World’s Most Innovative Companies, 4.4 times as often in LinkedIn’s list of North America’s Most In-Demand Employers, and twice as often in the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

It’s clear that there is a significant return to organizations that focus on employee experience over the long term, not just engagement in the here and now.

Compared with other companies, the experiential organizations had more than four times the average profit and more than two times the average revenue. They were also almost 25% smaller, which suggests higher levels of productivity and innovation.

And they outperformed the S&P 500, the NASDAQ, Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For, and Glassdoor’s Best Places to Work, in addition to the other organizations I studied, by considerable margins.

W170224_MORGAN_HOWINVESTING-850x898

It’s clear that there is a significant return to organizations that focus on employee experience over the long term, not just engagement in the here and now.

This means moving away from putting people into outdated workplaces, and redesigning workplaces and practices around your employees.

When I interviewed business leaders at the top-scoring organizations, they told me their investments in the three employee experience environments had led not only to happier employees but also to larger talent pipelines and greater profitability and productivity. But that was just anecdotal evidence. So I looked at appearances in “best of” lists. For instance, compared with the other companies I studied, those that invested most heavily in employee experience were included 28 times as often among Fast Company’s Most Innovative Companies, 11.5 times as often in Glassdoor’s Best Places to Work, 2.1 times as often in Forbes’s list of the World’s Most Innovative Companies, 4.4 times as often in LinkedIn’s list of North America’s Most In-Demand Employers, and twice as often in the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

Looking at the data, it’s clear that there is a significant return to organizations that focus on employee experience over the long term, not just engagement in the here and now. Adobe, for instance, has an EVP of customer and employee experience and is making considerable investments in

  • real-time employee feedback programs
  • beefing up diversity and inclusion efforts
  • giving employees access to consumer-grade technologies
  • and building workspaces according to multiple floor plans to accommodate different styles and preferences.

Your organization might want to take a different approach altogether. The important thing is to shift your attention away from those fickle engagement numbers and focus on how people experience your organization day by day. This means moving away from putting people into outdated workplaces, and redesigning workplaces and practices around your employees.

For full story – source